Young earth creationism radiometric dating statistics about dating abuse

Rated 3.83/5 based on 899 customer reviews

The whole discussion of evolution ends if you show that the earth is young.You can just erase evolution off the whiteboard because of soft tissue in dinosaur bones.” Armitage was hired as a microscopist to manage CSUN’s electron and confocal microscope suite in 2010.The case of Armitage is the latest to show the mounting hostility Christians face in academics and other public arenas.“Soft tissue in dinosaur bones destroys ‘deep time.’ Dinosaur bones cannot be old if they’re full of soft tissue,” Armitage said in a You Tube video. If you don’t have deep time, you don’t have evolution.“The other pillar is time because you cannot get a man from a frog unless the princess kissed the frog. So in science you have to have deep time to get evolution.” Subsequent to the controversy, Armitage has been on additional digs and found more soft tissue but is finding it difficult to get published.Kenneth Alfred Ham (born 20 October 1951) is an Australian Christian fundamentalist and young Earth creationist living in the United States.His findings seconded groundbreaking discoveries by noted molecular paleontologist Mary Schweitzer, who triggered an earthquake in the world of paleontology when she published about soft tissue in dinosaur bones in 2005.

Chance is required because we obviously can’t say that a thinking force created life on earth. If you kick out one of those two pillars the whole structure collapses,” Armitage noted.But CSUN lost its bid to have the judge summarily throw the case out of court as groundless in July of last year.So CSUN settled with Armitage for 9,500 in 2016, according to .In a “smoking gun” email, university officials suggested they could ease Armitage out of his part-time position by making it full-time, Reinach said.A colleague described the process as a “witch hunt,” according to . The university alleged his firing was simply a restructuring of their biology department and not a case of religious discrimination.

Leave a Reply